CRU Exonerated Based on Dubious Investigation

Everyone can rest easy, as some crackpot, ex-gubment team of lackeys in London declared that the emails stolen from one of the leading climate change research centers "contained no evidence to undermine the case for man made global warming." Apparently, this rigorous investigation into the British research unit named CRU, or Climatic Research Unit, found no wrongdoing, but don't worry, the report "criticized their lack of openness and said some of their data was misleading."  Oh, goodie. 

The team of expert investigators were from the esteemed University of East Anglia, eastern England.  I feel better already. "Their rigor and honesty as scientists are not in doubt," the report concluded. Okay, so why conduct the investigation in the first place? As memory serves, this team of scientists deleted emails prior to responding to questions about climate data lodged under Britain's freedom of information laws, sent emails telling members to delete data and refused to print or peer review any scientist's data that failed to line up to theirs. I can totally see their point. What is wrong with telling scientists to "hide the decline" or "trick" people by manipulating data to support the scientists' views?

Hold on. We can explain. Apparently, the investigators found that they did not mean to actually "hide the decline" in warming. The team also explained that the use of the word "trick" may have been "shorthand for a neat mathematical approach to a problem." Are you serious? What a bunch of garbage. I am much more skeptical of global warming than I was before I read their silly investigation.

The British authorities are still conducting an investigation to find the hacker that stole the dubious emails. I bet that investigation will yield real results. What a joke.